Hypertension crusade now - or wait until the year 2037?

Modern medicine regards itself to be an exact natural science, based on facts as results of scientific experiments. Indeed, students of medicine learn a complete doctrine of modern medicine; and they assume that this doctrine is composed of facts. They "believe" their teachers, and they believe in this doctrine (as most patients do). Too, they don't have any other choice, if they want to pass their examination and get their license as a physician.

The inner conflict starts, when they find a fact which doesn't fit into the official medical doctrine. What to do in such a case? Ask the professor? This could look as if you have doubts, like not believing fully what the teacher is teaching. Dangerous for a student who will be examined by this professor. Better to live with the inner conflict until the examination could be passed successfully.

After the physician's examination, it's not much better; the same medical doctrine is valid in the hospitals and the medical associations. Within the official doctrine, any fatal event is legally covered by the official doctrine and its medical experts, who will argue based on this doctrine in any legal conflict. Whoever is thinking and acting outside the borderlines of this official medical doctrine, is fair game, becoming an outcast. This can include destruction of the economic basis of life.

This means, that "modern medicine" is far from being an exact natural science. It is a doctrine. Consequently, in modern medicine only those facts and opinions are valid, that are acknowledged by the "ruling school", meaning by the leading representatives of the "ruling school". Any proven fact, or any opinion based on a proven fact, if not acknowledged by the system and its representatives, is not valid in this system.

Whenever there are new fundamental facts, proving the medical doctrine about this topic to be an error, it is of historical experience, that the "ruling medical school" will not accept the new facts. They will first try to ignore the facts, then to fight against, to spread around "directed misinformation" about, and to drive those people down who found the new facts. A famous German physicist, Max Planck, Nobel Prize Winner, said: "Wrong doctrines in science need 50 years until becoming replaced, because not only the respective teachers, but also their students have to die out before." After all, when they couldn't avoid the introduction of a therapy based on the new facts, they will argue: "What does he claim to bring new? We always claimed this" - and the "ruling medical school" will absorb the new therapy, declaring it as its own invention and development.

One of those expiring doctrines is the "incurability of hypertension". The expiration or sell-by date was in autumn of the year 1987, when I published two books about the cure of hypertension (one for physicians with the therapy, one for the patients), plus myself and Dr. Helmut Weiss were teaching it on the Medical Week of Baden-Baden 1987. About 250 physicians were participating, and they could interview several cured former hypertonic patients. But none of those physicians took over this highly effective therapy after the congress, up to now, 14 years later.

Now it is your choice: Do you want to wait until autumn of the year 2037, to get this curing therapy to hypertension for yourself and your friends? If not, if you want it now, it needs your participation in a hypertension crusade, to replace the expired doctrine now.